Denialism, the easy approach to climate change

When the climate change debate became inflamed in Australia this month, because of  the government’s plans to introduce carbon tax, researchers at the Australian National University received death threats.

Denialists – those who deny reality as a way of avoiding uncomfortable truth – have over the years attacked evolution, the cause of AIDS, and the link between smoking and cancer. They see conspiracy in everything.

Denialists have attacked the cause of AIDS, among other things. Credit: Flickr/edifica

Cristine Russell, president of the Council for the Advancement of Science Writing, thinks that denialists get caught up in a bigger, anti-science movement.

“These are people who do not know the facts and they become actively involved in the anti-science crusade without consciously knowing it,” she said.

Russell said some of them derive their views from religion, while others are driven by business motives.

“[The latter] is deliberate, calculated use of nonsense,” said Philip Hilts, director of the Knight Science Journalism Fellowships at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States.

Climate denial is a good example of the clash between scientific findings and political and economic expediency, Alan Leshner, chief executive officer of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, told the conference earlier.

“The scientific evidence is actually quite clear. But if you acknowledge it, if you say: ‘Aha! The world is warming’, you have to do something about it.

“It is much more convenient to deny it: the consequences on a personal level [in the US] are actually quite small.”

So that explains why the noise of climate denialists in Africa and the developing world is so muted.

Little to lose, and much to gain, by accepting it.

Munyaradzi Makoni, SciDev.Net contributor in South Africa

3 Responses to Denialism, the easy approach to climate change

  1. klem says:

    “The scientific evidence is actually quite clear. But if you acknowledge it, if you say: ‘Aha! The world is warming’, you have to do something about it.”

    Huh? I agree the evidence is extremely clear. I acknowledge it, the world is warming, but I have no intention of doing anything about it. It’s been warming since the end of the last ice age, it is hubris to think one could do anything about it.

  2. mikelistman says:

    Interesting topic. Believe the right noun would be “denial”, as in “a state of denying”. I don’t believe that the discipline or religion of “denialism” has been invented quite yet… Cheers!

  3. klem says:

    “It is much more convenient to deny it: the consequences on a personal level [in the US] are actually quite small.So that explains why the noise of climate denialists in Africa and the developing world is so muted. Little to lose, and much to gain, by accepting it.”

    Much to gain is right, billions in free money. Thank God climate change is dead. Cheers.

Comments closed. Read our blogs at www.Scidev.net

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: